← All HaltState questions and guides

Choosing a control stack

What are the best tools to control what an AI agent is allowed to do?

Choose by the action you need to control, not the framework label. Model guardrails, restricted credentials, runtime policy checks and evidence tools solve different problems. For a consequential business action, evaluate how those layers work together.

Match the tool to the problem

These are complementary capabilities, not necessarily four separate products. An API gateway or workflow service may already provide some controls; check its actual action context and review workflow before adding another component.

Questions to ask before choosing

  1. Where is enforcement? Can the same operation use an unconnected tool, direct API call or alternate credential?
  2. What can the rule evaluate? Verify agent identity, resource, destination and normalised amounts against your real request format—not a feature-list promise.
  3. What happens on uncertainty? Test a timeout, a missing field and an unresolved review. Check the selected SDK and configuration; do not assume a universal fail-open or fail-closed default.
  4. What is the latency budget? Measure policy evaluation separately from network time, council review and human waiting time.
  5. Can an operator investigate? Find the decision reason, reported outcome, available external confirmation and integrity result for one activity. Identify missing evidence explicitly.
  6. Who owns the control? Name the policy owner, permitted reviewers and the person responsible for testing integration coverage after changes.

Where HaltState fits

HaltState checks connected actions against policy before your application executes them. Policy comes first; eligible unresolved requests can go to the council, and unresolved council reviews go to a human. Rules explicitly requiring human approval still require a human.

Python, TypeScript/JavaScript, Go, Java and Rust SDKs are available. Use the documented release and integration guide for the features you need. The application's enforcement wiring, identity and network controls remain part of the system.

New Proof Packs require signatures. Investigation also includes other activity records, and a signed reported outcome is not independent confirmation of delivery or settlement. Inspect the evidence model and verified example.

Evaluate one action before expanding

Choose a refund, customer message or business-system write. In a test integration, exercise a permitted request, a prohibited request and a held request without sending a real payment or customer message. Inspect your account's investigation view and verify that the action did not run while blocked or pending.

The public Live Board is a synthetic retail demonstration, not a feed of your private account's activity. Use the policy go-live checklist to turn your evaluation into explicit launch criteria.

Related questions

Do I still need guardrails if I use runtime enforcement?

They address different failure paths. Model guardrails help with inputs and outputs; runtime checks control connected actions. Restricted permissions and isolation remain important because a policy integration does not automatically cover every tool or credential.

Can I evaluate the integration without production actions?

Start with the documented SDK workflow around a harmless test operation and inspect its decision and evidence in your account. Keep real customer destinations and payment execution disconnected during the evaluation. Passing that test demonstrates the tested integration, not coverage of every agent tool.